首页> 外文OA文献 >Contributors to and impact of residual shunting after device closure of atrial septal defects.
【2h】

Contributors to and impact of residual shunting after device closure of atrial septal defects.

机译:设备关闭房间隔缺损后残余分流的影响和影响。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of residual shunt in patients after device closure of atrial septal defect and its impact on long-term outcome has not been previously defined. METHODS: From a prospective, single-institution registry of 408 patients, we selected individuals with agitated saline studies performed 1 year after closure. Baseline echocardiographic, invasive hemodynamic, and comorbidity data were compared to identify contributors to residual shunt. Survival was determined by review of the medical records and the Social Security Death Index. Survival analysis according to shunt included construction of Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards modeling. RESULTS: Among 213 analyzed patients, 27% were men and age at repair was 47 ± 17 years. Thirty patients (14%) had residual shunt at 1 year. Residual shunt was more common with Helex (22%) and CardioSEAL/STARFlex (40%) occluder devices than Amplatzer devices (9%; P = .005). Residual shunts were more common in whites (79% vs 46%, P = .004). At 7.3 ± 3.3 years of follow-up, 13 (6%) of patients had died, including 8 (5%) with Amplatzer, 5 (25%) with CardioSEAL/STARFlex, and 0 with Helex devices. Patients with residual shunting had a higher hazard of death (20% vs 4%, P = .001; hazard ratio 4.95 [1.59-14.90]). In an exploratory multivariable analysis, residual shunting, age, hypertension, coronary artery disease, and diastolic dysfunction were associated with death. CONCLUSIONS: Residual shunt after atrial septal defect device closure is common and adversely impacts long-term survival.
机译:背景:房间隔缺损闭合后残留分流的患病率及其对远期结局的影响尚无定论。方法:从408名患者的前瞻性,单机构注册表中,我们选择了在封闭后1年进行激动性盐水研究的个体。比较基线超声心动图,浸润性血流动力学和合并症数据,以确定残余分流的原因。生存是通过检查病历和社会保障死亡指数来确定的。根据分流进行的生存分析包括构造Kaplan-Meier曲线和Cox比例风险模型。结果:在213例分析患者中,男性占27%,修复时年龄为47±17岁。 30名患者(14%)在1年时有残余分流。与Amplatzer装置(9%; P = .005)相比,Helex(22%)和CardioSEAL / STARFlex(40%)封堵器装置的残留分流更为常见。残流分流在白人中更为常见(79%比46%,P = .004)。在7.3±3.3年的随访中,有13名(6%)患者死亡,其中8名(5%)使用Amplatzer死亡,5名(25%)使用CardioSEAL / STARFlex,而0名使用Helex设备。残余分流的患者有更高的死亡危险(20%比4%,P = .001;危险比4.95 [1.59-14.90])。在探索性多变量分析中,残余分流,年龄,高血压,冠状动脉疾病和舒张功能障碍与死亡相关。结论:关闭房间隔缺损装置后的残余分流是常见的,并且不利于长期生存。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号